A nurse is teaching a client who has multiple sclerosis and has a new prescription for dantrolene

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis [MS] is a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment to slow its progression.1 Disease-modifying therapies [DMTs] are available for patients with MS; however, until recently, treatment options were mainly limited to injectable and intravenous medications. With the recent introduction of oral therapies [fingolimod in 2010, teriflunomide in 2012, and dimethyl fumarate in 2013], patients are now presented with more therapy choices, including the chance to switch from an injectable to an oral DMT. While for some long-term patients the opportunity to avoid an injection by moving to one of the newer oral medications is very appealing, an injectable therapy may continue to be recommended as an efficacious treatment for many patients. In addition, patients may also be reluctant to switch to an oral treatment because of the lack of long-term safety data on the oral MS therapies to date. As such, physicians and nurses who treat long-term patients need to be aware of the factors that may contribute to their dissatisfaction with an injectable DMT.

Although the concept of treatment fatigue for long-term patients has been discussed in the literature [eg, Pyatak et al],2 no universal definition for this condition could be found. For the purposes of this paper, treatment fatigue for patients with MS is defined as a waning commitment to continue with the prescribed treatment. The loss of commitment can be due to many different sources, and each can require a unique approach to helping patients overcome the barrier to adherence.

It is important to distinguish between compliance and adherence. The World Health Organization defines adherence to long-term therapy as, “the extent to which a person’s behavior – taking medications, following a diet, and/or executing life style changes – corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider”.3 In contrast, the term adherence connotes an active patient role in the medication regime.3 Compliance and adherence may be perceived as synonymous; however, the key difference between adherence and compliance is that adherence requires agreement from the patient as an active participant.3

Maintaining a commitment to long-term therapy can be extremely difficult, even for the most motivated patients. For example, a recent review of 24 studies that assessed adherence in patients with MS reported that adherence rates with injectable DMTs were as low as 49% in some cases.4 Although poor adherence rates are commonly reported in the literature, there is no universally accepted minimum rate of adherence that is considered desirable for chronic treatment. A low rate of adherence could have a significant impact on a patient’s disease course, as good adherence has been correlated with lower relapse rates and lower risk of hospital admission,5 further highlighting the need to develop techniques to prevent treatment fatigue and maintain adherence over the long-term.

Role of multiple sclerosis nurses

Most manufacturers of injectable MS DMTs offer support programs with uniquely trained nurses who provide in-home training and on-going support for patients prescribed a DMT [Table 1]. These programs are generally staffed by registered nurses [RNs] who have earned the Multiple Sclerosis Certified Nurse [MSCN] certification through the International Organization of MS Nurses. Follow-up in-home patient training and education by nurses as well as a series of follow-up phone calls are usually scheduled to monitor adherence and treatment fatigue. This follow-up contact is also helpful to assist in adverse event management, to monitor proper injection technique, and to assess for indications of treatment fatigue.

Table 1 Manufacturer-sponsored support programs providing reimbursement and/or nursing support assistance to patients with MS
Abbreviations: DMT, disease-modifying therapy; MS, multiple sclerosis.

MS nurses intervene with patients at diagnosis, providing ongoing support and education. At the initiation of treatment, nurses provide injection training along with education about realistic expectations of the effects of DMTs and tips for managing side effects. In the early phase of treatment, when side effects may be at their worst, the early support and intervention of nurses can be effective in assisting patients to remain adherent to therapy. It is important for nurses to maintain contact with patients over the long-term, as, later in treatment, the patients may show signs of treatment fatigue and feelings that they may not need to continue taking their medication as prescribed. In these cases, nurses can reinforce and educate as to the importance of remaining on therapy long-term. Patient-assistance programs that include nurse support are vital for imparting knowledge about self-injection and management of adverse events.6 Regularly reinforcing these key points can help patients adhere to complex medication administration protocols.6

MS nurses are often the main point of contact between patients and their care team on a day-to-day basis and therefore they play a pivotal role in producing positive outcomes in MS.6 The success of the pharmaceutical industry-sponsored patient support programs is indicative of the impact that properly trained nurses can have on patient education and skill development, all of which have an impact on patient adherence.6

Establishing a trusting relationship between patients and their treatment teams is critical when treating patients with MS, both at the start of therapy and over the long-term.7 Properly trained MS nurses can aid this process by instilling hope and a sense of empowerment that will help patients to achieve acceptance of their diagnosis and treatment.

Adherence to injectable therapies tends to decline over time,8 perhaps due to a loss of motivation and commitment relative to the period immediately following diagnosis. As symptoms begin to diminish and patients realize that long-term therapy is necessary, treatment fatigue may set in and adherence may falter. Most patients who discontinue therapy do so within 2 years of initiating treatment.9 For example, one observational study of patients on DMTs [n=632] found that 17% discontinued treatment over the course of 8 years and that 49% of those 17% stopped within the first 2 years.10 This decline in adherence after the 2-year mark may have occurred as treatment fatigue eroded the patients’ willingness to continue regular injections.

MS nurses can play a key role in educating, supporting, and encouraging patients with MS and their families to combat treatment fatigue. Ideally, the nurses should be part of an integrated health care team that is knowledgeable about MS and educates patients during each contact. The MS nurse also fulfills a primary role of teaching patients about their disease, symptom management, injection techniques, and health maintenance throughout the course of therapy. As such, MS nurses are positioned within the care team to directly work with patients to overcome treatment fatigue.

Factors that contribute to treatment fatigue

Treatment fatigue in patients on long-term therapy can be derived from multiple sources, and it is important for patients to understand that they may experience physical, cognitive, or psychosocial factors that can result in missed doses or therapy gaps. Adverse events associated with treatment are a common source of nonadherence. One observational study of patients on long-term therapy found that 50% of the sample had stopped taking medication due to clinical side effects.11 Common side effects leading to discontinuation by new patients on DMTs include influenza-like symptoms, depression, fatigue, and injection-site reactions [ISRs].12 Long-term patients typically discontinue treatment for perceived or clinical lack of efficacy.12 However, a resurgence of side effects, caused by a break or pause in therapy can cause the long-term patient to look for other treatment options.12

In addition to adverse events, psychosocial factors can precipitate treatment fatigue. Anxiety, fear, or ‘needle phobia’ may result in an inability to inject medication as prescribed.8,9 Depression, which affects approximately 50% of patients with MS,13 can also impact a patient’s motivation to maintain therapy.8,9,11,12 In addition to these psychological factors, financial burdens may cause patients to skip injections to make their medication last longer.4,8,9 Uninsured patients or patients unable to afford their medication copays may be forced to stop therapy for short periods of time or, in some cases, indefinitely.

In the USA, most pharmaceutical companies providing medication for the treatment of MS have programs that assist patients with affording their medications. When DMTs are prescribed for a patient, an insurance verification process is completed, and assistance is provided if needed and/or allowed. For uninsured or underinsured patients, a referral is made to various organizations or foundations that can assist in obtaining the medication.

The MS disease process itself may also lead to a decline in the patient’s willingness to comply with therapy. Cognitive issues that develope as part of the MS disease process may lead to nonadherence as patients forget to take their medication as prescribed. The multicenter observational Global Adherence Project found forgetting to take medication to be the most common reason for nonadherence.8 Sensory or motor deficits may also make self-injection difficult and sometimes impossible. DMT injections can be demanding and disruptive for patients who have cognitive deficits that increase the likelihood of forgetting to take their medication or motor impairments that reduce their manual dexterity.14,15

Multidisciplinary management of treatment fatigue

The team approach to care of patients with MS involves nurses working with others to identify sources of treatment fatigue and provide solutions to overcome these barriers [Figure 1]. Using a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, MS nurses can work directly with patients through clinical practice, education, and advocacy. There are several areas in which MS nurses can directly intervene with patients who are facing treatment fatigue, including management of adverse events and overcoming psychosocial factors. Positive support and the encouragement to be self-empowered can set the stage for improved commitment to DMTs over the long-term.

Figure 1 Strategies by which multiple sclerosis nurses can help manage treatment fatigue.
Notes: Multiple sclerosis nurses can help patients manage treatment fatigue through interactions during clinical practice, patient education, and patient advocacy. Through interventions at these levels, multiple sclerosis nurses can use various techniques to maintain patient adherence.
Abbreviations: DMT, disease-modifying therapy; ISR, injection site reactions; MS, multiple sclerosis.

Using a patient-centered dialogue with active listening and open-ended questions can help MS nurses assess a patient’s commitment to sustaining treatment over the long-term. Although self-assessment questionnaires have been used to identify patients with medication adherence issues in the outpatient setting,16–18 and may predict risks for treatment fatigue, such as belief in their DMT, side effects, and depression, there is no one gold standard test to measure adherence. As an alternative, patients can be rated on a scale of 1–10, with a score of 10 showing the highest level of commitment. When interviewing patients, it is important to ask about potentially waning commitment levels in a nonthreatening manner. For example, nurses can ask, “How many doses have you missed in the past 2 weeks?” instead of “Are you taking your medication [injections] as prescribed?” Probing questions may be helpful to ascertain information about reasons for missed doses. Once high-risk patients have been identified, MS nurses can help patients address possible barriers and provide additional support and education. Consistent education and re-education should empower patients to maintain control of their treatment, potentially improving their long-term adherence.19

Managing adverse events

Continued contact between patients and MS nurses may help to prevent or resolve some potential adverse effects of treatment. Nurses have the opportunity to proactively educate patients on the techniques to mitigate or avoid possible side effects. In addition, when adverse events arise, MS nurses may be the first part of the care team to be involved. Consistent follow-up by MS nurses is essential for managing adverse events. Follow-up phone calls at key intervals can help the treatment team identify patients who are facing side effects that may limit their willingness to adhere to treatment. As demonstrated in the Success of Titration, Analgesics, and BETA Nurse Support on Acceptance rates in MS Treatment [START] study for new patients, follow-up at key intervals improved patient adherence.20 Accordingly, long-term patients can also benefit from consistent follow-up intervention from an MS nurse.

Patients can then be educated on ways to manage side effects, such as premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dose titration, and alteration of the time of the injection.21 In addition, patients can be counseled on the importance of proper injection techniques, rotation of injection sites, and meticulous skin care, as these techniques have been shown to reduce adverse reactions at the site of the injection.21 Patients should also be educated on when to contact their health care professionals [HCPs] [ie, physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses] if they continue to have difficulties with adverse events despite using these techniques.

The START study measured the effectiveness of the combined effects of adverse event management techniques and nurse support on adherence to therapy in 96 patients with early-onset MS.20 The results showed that 78.1% of participants who received nurse support combined with dose titration and analgesics were adherent to therapy [ie, they completed >75% of scheduled injections] over the course of 12 months.20 The mean compliance rate was 84.4%.20 The authors concluded that the training and support provided by the nurses in the study provided the patients with encouragement, comfort, and confidence in the self-injection procedure, which may have contributed to the improvements in adherence that were seen.20

For patients who are still struggling with self-injections, we recommend in-person reinstruction with a nurse to improve the patient’s injection technique followed by additional phone contact. We have found that many of these patients have not retained all of the teaching points from the initial lessons and, therefore, retraining with the help of an MS nurse can improve injection technique. In our experience, often a small change in injection technique is all that is needed to successfully resolve the issues that are preventing the patient from successfully completing the injection.

Use of an autoinjector has also been shown to reduce adverse events, such as injection pain, when compared with standard syringes.22 When properly used, autoinjectors ensure that needles remain sterile and allow patients to independently inject in difficult-to-reach areas. Autoinjectors that disguise the needle so that the patient does not see it during the injection process can also be useful tools for patients with a dislike of needles or an outright needle phobia, potentially increasing the patient’s confidence that he or she can successfully complete the injection.

Some information from new patients can be transferred to manage long-term patients. Follow-up contact with most patients validates this theory. Use of an autoinjector is a strong predictor of adherence and further validated from follow-up contacts. A study of 294 patients from 82 sites in France evaluated patients who were starting their first month of therapy with interferon beta-1b using manual injections who were then switched to an autoinjector after 1 month. The percentage of patients reporting ISRs decreased significantly when autoinjectors were used [24% versus 36% using the standard injection technique [P

Chủ Đề