Explain one spatial change in manufacturing employment patterns as a result of deindustrialization.
|
G Show
A. Describe the change in the dominant economic sector during industrialization and during deindustrialization B. Explain ONE spatial change in manufacturing employment patterns as a result of deindustrialization C. Explain ONE likely outcome of deindustrialization in a region of manufacturing communities. D. Comparing the development of steel and the invention of the computer chip, explain how technology development drove economic change in both the industrial the industrial revolution and the transition to a service based economy E. Describe the significance of a growth pole in an urban or regional economy. F. Explain how post-Fortist methods of production have transformed operations at individual factories. G. Explain the degree to which least cost theory predicts the local site-selection factors for the location of multinational service industrial corporate offices.Step-by-step answers: 0 Other questions on the subject: GeographyG Geography, 07.10.2021 17:04 Why do some ignore climate change? What does science have to say? G Geography, 10.01.2022 19:47 How would you describe the elevation of the region? G Geography, 10.01.2022 18:27 Enumera diversas actividades agroganaderas que generen impactos positivos para las personal y el medio natural G Geography, 16.11.2020 11:05 In which essential aspect of geography would you learn about the creation of mountains A. Human systems B. physical systems C. places and regions D. Uses of geography Popular questions today:M Mathematics, 01.12.2020 18:02 S Social Studies, 01.12.2020 18:03 E English, 01.12.2020 18:05 B Biology, 01.12.2020 18:07 M Mathematics, 01.12.2020 18:08 M Mathematics, 01.12.2020 18:08 M Mathematics, 05.03.2021 22:01 M Mathematics, 05.03.2021 22:02 B Biology, 05.03.2021 22:07 E English, 17.12.2020 02:01 journal article Spatial Restructuring of Manufacturing and Employment Growth in the Rural Midwest: An Analysis for IndianaEconomic Geography Vol. 63, No. 4 (Oct., 1987) , pp. 319-333 (15 pages) Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2307/143693 https://www.jstor.org/stable/143693 Read and download Log in through your school or library Purchase article $51.00 - Download now and later Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $51.00 USD. How does it work?
Abstract County employment data are used to analyze employment change in Indiana during the period 1950-1980. Growth in services are examined as the major source of the nonmetropolitan turnaround in total employment growth experienced during the 1970s. Contrary to the proposed hypothesis, it is found that the growth of manufacturing employment in nonmetropolitan areas accounted for a significant proportion of this turnaround. This finding is further supported by evidence of the shift of manufacturing employment from metropolitan areas to nonmetropolitan areas. The metro-nonmetro employment shift of manufacturing, in response to the low-wage attraction of nonmetropolitan areas, seems to have preceded the shift in total population and nonmanufacturing employment growth. Journal Information Economic Geography, published quarterly, is a leading English-language journal devoted to the study of economic geography and is widely read by academics and professionals around the world. Highlighting the publication of theoretically-based empirical articles and case studies of significant theoretical trends that are occurring within the field of economic geography, the journal serves as a forum for high-quality and innovative scholarship. In keeping with the international scope and impact of this work, Economic Geography focuses upon exciting new research ideas and analyses emerging from scholarly networks worldwide. Each issue includes feature articles and book reviews. Articles in the past decade chronicle the significant upsurge of scholarly interest in economic geography during a period of massive change, rampant technological growth, and realignment in the global economy. Economic Geography will continue to stress important contributions to the ongoing development of theory in global economic geography. Publisher Information Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. What is one likely outcome of deindustrialization in a region of manufacturing communities?Deindustrialization causes the economic capital for manufacturing within a particular region to be lost to other parts of a country or to other countries. The effects of deindustrialization, however, are typically regional, and can lead to a loss in the economic vibrancy and cultural pride within a region.
What are the effects of deindustrialization?Deindustrialization and job cuts often lead to long periods of unemployment, intermittent employment and increased underemployment, and the effects transcend simply the loss of pay, medical benefits and purchasing power.
What is said to be one of the results of deindustrialization?During deindustrialization, the declining share of employment in manufacturing appears to mirror a decline in the share of manufacturing value added in GDP. At first glance, this decline would suggest that domestic expenditure on manufactures has decreased while expenditure on services has increased.
What are the factors of deindustrialization?Causes of Deindustrialization. A consistent decline in employment in manufacturing, due to social conditions that make such activity impossible (states of war or environmental upheaval). ... . A shift from manufacturing to service sectors of the economy. ... . A trade deficit whose effects preclude investment in manufacturing.. |
