So sánh gtx 650 vs gt 430 năm 2024

Nếu bạn muốn so sánh hiệu năng của một card đồ họa nào đó với một card đồ họa khác, bạn đã đến đúng trang web cần tìm! Bảng dưới đây sắp xếp các loại card đồ họa vào các cấp bậc hiệu năng từ cao đến thấp. Các loại card cùng một cấp bậc thì có hiệu năng tương đương nhau.

Để tìm 1 card đồ họa nào đó, nhấn Ctrl+F để dùng tính năng tìm kiếm trên trình duyệt của bạn, sau đó gõ tên card đồ họa mà bạn muốn tìm.

Chú thích: Tên card có màu xanh da trời là card rời dùng cho máy tính để bàn (PC), màu xanh lá là card onboard.

Chú ý: các loại card onboard đời thấp của Intel không được liệt kê ở đây, chẳng hạn như Intel(R) 82945G, Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset... Đây là những loại card rất yếu và chỉ có thể chơi được những game nhẹ.

AMD APU A8-6500 Quad-Core AMD APU A8-6500B Quad-Core AMD Phenom II X4 B93 AMD Phenom II X4 925 AMD Phenom II X4 830

Intel Pentium Dual Core E6300 2.8GHz AMD Opteron 1222 SE AMD Opteron 8222 SE AMD Opteron 8222 Intel Celeron E3400 Dual-Core 2.6GHz

Possible GPU Upgrades

-

AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition AMD Radeon HD 6870 XFX DD XXX Edition AMD Radeon HD 6870 XFX Black Edition Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Club3D CoolStream Super OC 1GB Edition Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 EVGA DS SSC 1GB Edition

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76896CUDA cores768no dataCUDA cores per GPUno data96Core clock speed928 MHz700 MHzNumber of transistors2,540 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)110 Watt49 WattMaximum GPU temperature105 °C98 °CTexture fill rate59.2 billion/sec11.2 billion/secFloating-point performance1,425 gflops268.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI-E 2.0 x 16InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)Height4.376" (11.1 cm)2.713" (6.9 cm)Width2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5.4 GB/s800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s25.6 - 28.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMIHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVIMulti monitor support4 Displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.34.2OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 430 by 319% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 430 by 319% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 430 by 376% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 430 by 248% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 430 by 667% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GT 430. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 49 Mh/s 17 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.26 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.1 kh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 6.50 1.55 Recency 9 October 2012 11 October 2010 Cost $149 $79 Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 96 Memory bandwidth 86.4 25.6 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 49 Watt

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GeForce GT 430

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.