What are the key differences between a strong mayor and a weak mayor government?

The mayor–council government system is a system of local government that has a mayor who is directly elected by the voters serve as chief executive, and a separately elected legislative city council. It is one of the two most common forms of local government in the United States, and is also used in Brazil,[1] Canada, Italy, Israel, New Zealand, Poland and Turkey.[citation needed] It is the one most frequently adopted in large cities, although the other form, council–manager government, is the local government form of more municipalities.

The form may be categorized into two main variations depending on the relative power of the mayor compared to the council. In a typical strong-mayor system, the elected mayor is granted almost total administrative authority with the power to appoint and dismiss department heads. In such a system, the mayor's administrative staff prepares the city budget, although that budget usually must be approved by the council.[2]

Conversely, in a weak-mayor system, the mayor has no formal authority outside the council, serving a largely ceremonial role as council chairperson. The mayor cannot directly appoint or remove officials, and lacks veto power over council votes.[3]

Most major American cities use the strong-mayor form of the mayor–council system, whereas middle-sized and small American cities tend to use the council–manager system.[4]

You probably learned about American government in high school. Three branches. Checks and balances. Bi-cameral legislature. You may even remember that, before the Constitution was drafted, the Articles of Confederation first adopted by the founding generation didn’t include a presidency separate from congress.

But you probably didn’t learn about the way cities and counties govern.

For that you’d need to read your local charter (it’s like the municipal version of the Constitution). Across the country, cities and counties have come up with thousands of diverse ways to organize a government. Sometimes the mayor is part of the local council and other times the mayor is a separate entity. Sometimes the mayor gets a vote at council meetings, other times not. Frequently the mayor is simply a figurehead who appoints a professional city manager to oversee the government’s various operations and departments.

Broadly speaking, all of these combinations can usually be classified as “Strong Mayor” or “Weak Mayor.”

There’s some variation in how cities refer to these arrangements, but more often than not a “Strong Mayor” system can also be called a “mayor–council government” system and a “Weak Mayor” system can be referred to as a “council–manager government” system.  

Usually, in a “Strong Mayor” system an elected mayor has direct administrative authority over the government and its departments. Under a “Weak Mayor” system, an appointed city manager (something like a municipal CEO) has that administrative authority.

Regardless of which form the government takes, we’re typically dealing with two branches of government: (1) the executive either in the form of a “Strong Mayor” or a city manager appointed by a “Weak Mayor” and (2) a legislature in the form of a city commission, town council, board of county commissioners, etc. and all of the lower boards and committees that may comprise or report back to the main legislative body.

Either way, it’s most often the executive who has direct authority over the government’s departments and professional staff while the legislature is able to enact laws or sit in a quasi-judicial capacity to authorize various permits, waivers, licenses, etc.

What are the key differences between a strong mayor and a weak mayor government?
What are the key differences between a strong mayor and a weak mayor government?

Before speaking at your next public meeting, it’s a good idea to learn which form of government your city or county uses. This way, you know which officials have decision-making authority over your issue and you can prepare yourself to address their concerns directly. 

What are the differences between a strong mayor system of government and a weak mayor system What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

Under the strong system, the mayor works full time and has strong influence over the city. Under the weak mayor system, the mayor's power is LIMITED. The council does most of the work and the mayor directs the council meetings and does what the council asks him to do.

How does a strong mayor form of government differ from a weak mayor form of government quizlet?

How does a strong mayor form of government differ from a weak mayor form of government? In a strong mayor system, the mayor prepares the budget and sets the council agenda. In a weak mayor system, the mayor and council share administrative authority.

What are the strengths of the mayor

Arguments For the Mayor-Council Form There is a separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. There are checks and balances. The council can refuse to confirm the mayor's appointments and the mayor can veto the council's legislation.

What is one major feature of local governments with a weak mayor

In a weak mayor-council government, the executive authority of the mayor is less expansive and more power is shared with the council. The general characteristics of the mayor-council governments are as follows: City council appoints and approves departmental heads.