When an organization decentralized it leads to a more participative structure

Definitions

Centralization refers to organizational structures and procedures that concentrate power and decision-making authority at the highest levels of the organizational hierarchy. Decentralization refers to organizational structures and procedures that allow for power sharing and delegation of decision-making authority to lower levels of the organizational hierarchy, including decision making by front line employees.

Introduction

In the past few decades, much organizational literature from both the public and private sectors has argued for the benefits of reducing bureaucracy. Indeed, many public management scholars have asserted that bureaucratic characteristics such as red tape, rules, and standardized procedures negatively affect organizational effectiveness and responsiveness to constituents and lead to such negative employee work outcomes as...

References

• Adler PS (2012) The sociological ambivalence of bureaucracy: from weber via Gouldner to Marx. Organ Sci 23(1):244–266

  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

• Berings D, De Fruyt F, Bouwen R (2004) Work values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personal Individ Differ 36(2):349–364

  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

• Cools E, Van den Broeck H, Bouckenooghe D (2009) Cognitive styles and person–environment fit: investigating the consequences of cognitive (mis)fit. Eur J Work Organ Psy 18(2):167–198

  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

  Google Scholar 

• Im T, Campbell JW, Cha S (2013) Revisiting Confucian bureaucracy: roots of the Korean government's culture and competitiveness. Public Adm Dev 33(4):286–296

  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

• Jansen KJ, Kristof-Brown A (2006) Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. J Manag Issues 18(2):193–212

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer RE, Hammerschmid G (2010) The degree of decentralization and individual decision making in central government human resource management: a European comparative perspective. Public Adm 88(2):455–478

  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

• Pollitt C (2005) Decentralization. In: Ferlie E, Lynn LE Jr, Pollitt C (eds) The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 371–397

  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Public Administration, School of Public & Global Affairs, Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL, USA

   Jaehee Jong

2. Center for Women in Government and Civil Society, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY, USA

   Sue R. Faerman

Authors

1. Jaehee Jong

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Sue R. Faerman

   View author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaehee Jong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

   Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Importance of Decentralization

The major importance of decentralization include:

1. Reduces the burden of top executives

Decentralization of authority relieves top executives from operating details or routine work so that they can concentrate on more important functions of policy-making, coordination, and control.

As a company grows beyond the reach of the chief executive, decentralization becomes necessary. By delegating authority for operating decisions, top management can extend its lead over a giant enterprise.

1. Quick and better decisions

Decentralization permits prompt and more accurate decisions because decisions are made by those who are fully aware of the realities of the situation. Decisions can be made near the point of action without consulting higher levels and without waiting for the approval of top executives.

1. Growth and diversification

Decentralization facilitates growth and diversification of products and markets. Under decentralization, each product line is treated as a separate division so that it can respond quickly to the changing demands of its special market.

The self-contained product divisions enjoy considerable independence and proper emphasis can be put on each product line under the overall coordination and control of top management.

1. Better communication

Decentralization improves organizational communication and efficiency because there are fewer levels of authority. The problems of red-tape and bureaucratic delays are reduced.

1. Development of executives

Decentralization provides an opportunity to subordinate managers to take initiative and acquire leadership qualities. Lower-level executives learn to manage by exercising delegated authority.

A reservoir of promotable managers becomes available which -simplifies management successions and helps to ensure continuity of management.

Decentralization promotes autonomy, initiative, and creativity on the part of subordinates.

As the success and survival of the organization do not depend upon a few individuals at the top, decentralization makes for stability and continuity of the enterprise.

1. Improvement in motivation and morale

Decentralization improves job satisfaction, motivation, and morale of subordinates. Opportunity to make decisions provides a sense of belonging and satisfies the needs for power, prestige, status, and independence.

A climate of competition is generated. High motivation and morale help in improving productivity and working relationships. Better utilization of talents at lower levels can be made.

1. Effective supervision and control

Decentralization results in effective supervision because managers at the lower levels have complete authority to make changes in work assignments, to take disciplinary action, to recommend promotions and to change production schedule.

Decentralization also promotes effective control through a comparative evaluation of performance and clear-cut accountability for results.

1. Democratic management

Decentralization makes for democratic management and flexibility of operations. People at lower levels do not feel alienated from the top and there is little danger of administration becoming top-heavy or monolithic.

Necessary changes can be made without dislocating the entire structure.

Advantages of Decentralization

The major advantages of decentralization include:

1. By delegating day-to-day problem solving to lower-level managers, top management can concentrate on bigger issues such as overall strategy.
2. Empowering lower-level managers to make decisions puts the decision-making authority in the hands of those who tend to have the most detailed and up-to-date information about day-to-day operations.
3. By eliminating layers of decision making and approvals, organizations can respond more quickly to customers and changes in the operating environment.
4. Granting decision-making authority helps train lower-level managers for higher-level positions.
5. Empowering lower-level managers to make decisions can increase their motivation and job satisfaction.

Disadvantages of Decentralization

1. Lower-level managers may make decisions without fully understanding the big picture.
2. If lower-level managers make their own decisions, coordination may be lacking.
3. Lower-level managers may have objectives that clash with the objectives of the entire organization. 1 For example, a manager may be more interested in increasing the size of his or her department, leading to more power and prestige, than in increasing the department’s effectiveness.
4. Spreading innovative ideas may be difficult in a decentralized organization. Someone in one part of the organization may have a terrific idea that would benefit other parts of the organization, but without a strong central direction, the idea may not be shared with and adopted by, other parts of the organization. This problem can be reduced by effective use of intranet systems that make it easier for information to be shared across departments.

Decentralization and Participative management

Some people get the idea that the more decentralized an organization is, the more democratic or participative it is in terms of managers sharing decision-making with subordinate employees. This is not necessarily true.

Decentralization, however, involves pushing some decision-making down the line to subordinate managers, and, in this sense, it develops more participation in decision-making.

However, this does not mean that all subordinates will participate in all decision-making.

In the first place, as has been noted, decisions on some matters are reserved by upper-level managers and others may be made only by the top managers and, in some cases, even by the board of directors.

In the second place, delegation to subordinate managers of authority to make decisions at their respective levels does not mean that these managers will allow their subordinates to share in top-level decision-making.

Some managers at upper levels may be highly participative or democratic in the way they make decisions, and others may not be. Essentially, decentralization and participative management are different matters.

Decentralization and Segment Reporting

Effective decentralization requires segmented reporting.

In addition to the companywide income statement, reports are needed for individual segments of the organization. A segment is a part or activity of an organization about which managers would like cost, revenue, or profit data.

Cost, profit, and investment centers are segments as are sales territories, individual stores, service centers, manufacturing plants, marketing departments, individual customers, and product lines.

A company’s operations can be segmented in many ways. With the appropriate database and software, managers could easily drill even further down into the organization.

For example, the sales in California could be segmented by product family, then by product line. This drill-down capability helps managers to identify the sources of strong or weak overall financial performance.

These segmented income statements are useful in analyzing the profitability of segments and in measuring the performance of segment managers.

What happens when an organization decentralized?

What is decentralization organizational structure?

What are the benefits of a decentralized organization?

Can decentralization affect the organization?