The internal structure of words and processes of word formation in English
|
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. Show
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution. Buying optionsChapter EUR 29.95 Price includes VAT (Singapore)
eBookEUR 245.03Price includes VAT (Singapore)
Softcover BookEUR 299.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)
Hardcover BookEUR 299.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)
Learn about institutional subscriptions PreviewUnable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Adams, Valerie. 2001. Complex Words in English. Longman: London. Google Scholar Algeo, John. 1971. “The voguish uses of non.” American Speech 46, 87–105. CrossRef Google Scholar Allen, Margaret. 1978. Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs. Google Scholar Anderson, Mona. 1979. Noun Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs. Google Scholar Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Google Scholar Andrews, Edna. 1986. “A synchronic analysis of de- and un- in American English.” American Speech 61/3, 221–232. CrossRef Google Scholar Apresjan, Jurij. 1974. “Regular Polysemy.” Linguistics 142, 5–32. Google Scholar Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press: Cambridge MA. Google Scholar Aronoff, Mark and Sungeun Cho. 2001. “The semantics of -ship suffixation.” Linguistic Inquiry 32, 167–173. CrossRef Google Scholar Aronoff, Mark and Fuhrhop, Nanna. 2002. “Restricting Suffix Combinations in German and English: Closing Suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20/3, 451–490. CrossRef Google Scholar Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. Google Scholar Barker, Chris. 1998. “Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation.” Language 74, 695–727. CrossRef Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The Grammar of Nominal Compounding with special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press. Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 1987. “-ee by Gum!” American Speech 62, 315–19. CrossRef Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 1993. “More-ee words.” American Speech 68, 222–4. CrossRef Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 1998. “When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English?” English Language and Linguistics 2/1, 65–86. Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie. 2003. “English Prefixation — A Typological Shift?” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50/1–2, 33–40. CrossRef Google Scholar Bauer, Laurie and Renouf, Antoinette. 2001. “A corpus-based study of compounding in English.” Journal of English Linguistics 29/2, 101–123. CrossRef Google Scholar Beard, Robert. 1976. “Once more on the analysis of ed-adjectives.” Journal of Linguistics 12, 155–157. CrossRef Google Scholar Beard, Robert. 1991. “Decompositional Composition: The Semantics of Scope Ambiguities and ‘Bracketing Paradoxes.’” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 195–229. CrossRef Google Scholar Beard, Robert. 1993. “Simultaneous Dual Derivational Origin.” Language 69, 716–41. CrossRef Google Scholar Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme Morpheme Base Morphology. SUNY Press: Albany, NY. Google Scholar Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. “On the grammar of local prepositions.” In: M. Bierwisch, W. Motsch, and I. Zimmermann (eds.), Syntax, Semantik, und Lexikon: Rudolf Ruzicka zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1–65. Google Scholar Bierwisch, Manfred. 1996. “How Much Space Gets Into Language?” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 31–76. Google Scholar Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar Booij, Geert. 1986. “Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch ‘Agent’ Nouns.” Linguistics 24, 503–17. Google Scholar Booij, Geert. 1988. “The relation between inheritance and argument-linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch.” In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybrechts, and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 57–74. Google Scholar Booij, Geert. 1992. “Compounding in Dutch.” Rivista di Linguistica 4/1, 37–60. Google Scholar Booij, Geert and Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. “On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch.” Linguistics 42/2, 327–357. CrossRef Google Scholar Booij, Geert and van Haaften, Ton. 1988. “On the external syntax of derived words: evidence from Dutch.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 29–44. Google Scholar Botha, Rudolf P. 1980. Word-based morphology and synthetic compounding. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, No. 5, University of Stellenbosch. Google Scholar Brekle, Herbert. 1970. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: Fink. Google Scholar Bresnan, Joan. 1982. “Polyadicity.” In: J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 149–172. Google Scholar Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In: R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184–221. Google Scholar Clark, Eve and Clark, Herbert. 1979. “When nouns surface as verbs.” Language 55/4, 767–811. CrossRef Google Scholar Comrie, Bernard and Thompson, Sandra. 1985. “Lexical nominalization.” In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume III. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 349–398. Google Scholar Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar Don, Jan. 1993. Morphological Conversion. OTS Dissertation series. University of Utrecht. Google Scholar Fabb, Nigel. 1988. “English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527–539. CrossRef Google Scholar Fraser, Bruce. 1976. The Verb-Particle Combination in English. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar Fu, Jingqi; Roeper, Thomas; and Borer, Hagit. 2001. “The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 549–582. CrossRef Google Scholar Giegerich, Heinz. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Giegerich, Heinz. 2004. “Compound or Phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion.” English Language and Linguistics 8/1, 1–24. CrossRef Google Scholar Gorska, Elzbieta. 1984. “Moonless nights and smoke-free cities, or what can be without what? A cognitive study of privative adjectives in English.” Folia Linguistica 28/3–4, 413–435. Google Scholar Gracia, Lluisa and Azkarate, Miren. 1998. Prefixes, heads and word order. Ms. University of Girona and University of the Basque Country. Google Scholar Gracia, Lluisa and Lieber, Rochelle. 2000. “Sobre el prefijo ex-.” Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of General Linguistics, Cadiz. Google Scholar Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. Google Scholar Gussmann, Edmund. 1987. “The lexicon of English De-adjectival Verbs.” In: E. Gussmann (ed.), Rules and the Lexicon. Lublin: Catholic University Press, 79–101. Google Scholar Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf. 2000. “Formal versus encyclopaedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations.” In: B. Peeters (ed.), The Lexcion-Encyclopedia Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 349–374. Google Scholar Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. “Word-class Changing inflection and Morphological Theory.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 43–66. Google Scholar Heyvaert, Lisbiet. 2001. Deverbal-er suffixation as morphological equivalent of the clausal Subject-Finite unit. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Preprint 176. Google Scholar Higginbotham, James. 1985. “On Semantics.” Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–594. Google Scholar Hoeksema, Jack. 1985. Categorial Morphology. New York: Garland Publishing. Google Scholar Hoeksema, Jack. 1988. “Head-types in Morpho-Syntax.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 123–138. Google Scholar Horn, Laurence. 1989. Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; reprinted 2001 by CSLI: Stanford. Google Scholar Horn, Laurence. 2002. “Uncovering the Un-Word: A study in lexical pragmatics.” Sophia Linguistica 49, 1–64. Google Scholar Horn, Laurence. (Forthcoming). An Un-paper for the Un-Syntactician. Ms. Yale University. Google Scholar Hudson, Richard. 1975. “Problems in the analysis of ed-adjectives.” Journal of Linguistics 11, 69–72. Google Scholar Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. Google Scholar Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. “The Architecture of the Linguistic-Spatial Interface.” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–30. Google Scholar Jespersen, Otto. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI. Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. Google Scholar Kastovsky, Dieter. 1969. “Wortbildung und Nullmorphem.” Linguistische Berichte 2, 1–13. Google Scholar Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Kettemann, Bernhard. 1988. Die Phonologie Morphologischer Prozesse im Amerikanischen Englisch. Tubingen: Narr. Google Scholar Keyser, Samuel Jay and Roeper, Thomas. 1992. “Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis.” Linguistic Inquiry 23, 89–125. Google Scholar Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology.” In: H. van der Hulst and N. Smith, (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–175. Google Scholar Kjellmer, Goren. 2001. “Why weaken but not strongen on deadjectival verbs.” English Studies 2, 154–171. CrossRef Google Scholar Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar Landau, Barbara. 1996. “Multiple Geometric Representations of Objects in Languages and Language Learners.” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 317–364. Google Scholar Lees, Robert. 1961. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar Lehnert, Martin. 1971. Reverse Dictionary of Present-Day English. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie. Google Scholar Lehrer, Adrienne. 1995. “Prefixes in English word-formation.” Folia Linguistica 29/1–2, 133–148. CrossRef Google Scholar Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar Levin, Beth. 1999. “Objecthood: an event structure perspective.” Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 35/1, 223–47. Google Scholar Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka. 1988. “Non-event -er Nominals: A Probe into Argument Structure.” Linguistics 26, 1067–83. CrossRef Google Scholar Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [published by IULC, 1981 and Garland Press 1990.] Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 1981. “Morphological conversion within a restrictive theory of the lexicon.” In: M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 161–200. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. “Argument Linking and Compounds in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 251–286. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 1998. “The Suffix -ize in English: Implications for Morphology.” In: S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, and P. M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 12–34. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle and Baayen, Harald. 1997. “A Semantic Principle of Auxiliary Selection in Dutch.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15/4, 789–845. CrossRef Google Scholar Lieber, Rochelle and Baayen, Harald. 1999. “Nominalizations in a Calculus of Lexical Semantic Representations.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 175–198. Google Scholar Ljung, Magnus. 1970. English denominal adjectives. Gothenburg Studies in English, Lund. Google Scholar Ljung, Magnus. 1976. “-ed adjectives revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 12, 159–168. Google Scholar Mahn, Lothar. 1971. Zur Morphologie und Semantik englischer Verben auf-IFY mit Berucksichtigung franzosischer und deutscher Entsprechungen. Tubingen: Narr. Google Scholar Marchand, Hans. 1966. “On attributive and predicative derived adjectives and some problems related to the distinction.” Anglia 84, 131–149. Google Scholar Marchand, Hans. 1966. “On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffixal derivatives not containing a verbal element.” Indogermanische Forschungen 70/1, 118–145. Google Scholar Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation. Munich: Beck. Google Scholar Maynor, Natalie. 1979. “The morpheme un-.” American Speech 54, 310–311. CrossRef Google Scholar Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Google Scholar Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1996. “Transfers of Meaning.” In: J. Pustejovsky and B. Boguraev (eds.), Lexical Semantics, the problem of polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 109–132. Google Scholar Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Sprouse, Ronald. 1999. “From MPARSE to CONTROL: Deriving ungrammaticality.” Phonology 16/2, 191–225. CrossRef Google Scholar Panther, Klaus and Thornburg, Linda. 1998. “The Polysemy of the Derivational -er Suffix in English.” Paper delivered at the Cognitive Morphology Workshop, Ghent, Belgium, July, 1998. Google Scholar Pennanen, Esko. 1971. Conversion and Zero Derivation in English. Tampere: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis. Ser. A vol. 40. Google Scholar Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1996. Gaps in Word Formation. In: U. Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Academie Verlag, 194–209. Google Scholar Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth. 1992. “-ER Nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. In: T. Stowell and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 26, Syntax and the Lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 127–153. Google Scholar Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth. 1998. “Building verb meanings.” In: M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 97–134. Google Scholar Riddle, Elizabeth. 1985. “A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity.” In: J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics Historical Word-Formation. Berlin. Mouton Publishers, 435–461. Google Scholar Roeper, Thomas. 1988. “Compound Syntax and Head Movement.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1. Dordrecht: Foris, 187–228. Google Scholar Roeper, Thomas. 1999. “Leftward Movement in Morphology.” In: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34, 35–66. Google Scholar Roeper, Thomas and van Hout, Angeliek. 1999. The impact of nominalization on passive,-able and middle: Burzio’s generalization and feature-movement in the lexicon. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Utrecht University. Google Scholar Roeper, Thomas and Siegel, Muffy. 1978. “A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds.” Linguistic Inquiry 9, 197–260. Google Scholar Romaine, Suzanne. 1983. “On the productivity of word formation rules and limits of variability in the lexicon.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 3, 177–200. CrossRef Google Scholar Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. “Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formations in Present-day English.” English Language and Linguistics 3, 269–297. CrossRef Google Scholar Schneider, Edgar. 1987. “Beobachtungen zur Pragmatik der verbbildenden Suffixe -en,-ify, und-ize im Englischen.” Sprachwissenschaft 12, 88–109. Google Scholar Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. Google Scholar Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar Simpson, John (ed.). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Slotkin, Alan. 1990. “Adjectival -less and -free: A case of shifting institutional currency.” American Speech 65/1, 33–49. CrossRef Google Scholar Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar Southerland, Ronald. 1994. “Derivatives in pre-: a persuasive morphological resource?“ American Speech 69/2, 168–176. CrossRef Google Scholar Spencer, Andrew. 1999. “Transpositions and Argument Structure.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–102. Google Scholar Sproat, Richard. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar Štekauer, Pavol. 1996. A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar Štekauer, Pavol. 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar Strauss, Steven. 1982. “On ‘relatedness paradoxes’ and related paradoxes.” Linguistic Inquiry 13, 694–700. Google Scholar Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Toman, Jindrich. 1983. Wortsyntax. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2001. “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over.” Language 77/4, 724–765. Google Scholar Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The Semantics of English Prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar Walinska de Hackbeil, Hannah. 1986. The roots of phrase structure: The syntactic base of English morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle. Google Scholar Williams, Darrell. 1992. “English comparative compounds with OVER, UNDER, and OUT.” Proceedings of ESCOL 1992, 272–281. Google Scholar Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument Structure and Morphology.” Linguistic Review 1, 81–114. CrossRef Google Scholar Williams, Edwin. 1981. “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.” Linguistic Inquiry 12/2, 245–274. Google Scholar Zimmer, Karl. 1964. Affixal Negation in English and Other Languages. Supplement to Word, Monograph No. 5. Google Scholar Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa and van Haaften, Ton. 1988. “English -ing and Dutch -en Nominal Constructions: A Case of Simultaneous Nominal and Verbal Projections.” In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybrechts, and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 361–394. Google Scholar Download references Author informationAuthors and Affiliations
Authors
Editor informationEditors and Affiliations
Rights and permissionsReprints and Permissions Copyright information© 2005 Springer About this chapterCite this chapterLieber, R. (2005). English Word-Formation Processes. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16 What is the internal structure of words?Morphology is the aspect of language concerned with the internal structure of words, and languages vary in the extent to which they rely on morphological structure.
What are the processes in word formation?There are nine essential word formation processes namely; Derivation, Back Formation, Conversion, Compounding, Clipping, Blending, Abbreviation, Acronyms, and Borrowing.
What are the 5 types of word formation?In this paper, the writer found five types of word formation used in the chapter sixteen of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone novel written by J. K. Rowling. They are inflection, suppletion, derivation, cliticization, and compounding.
What is the process of word formation in English called?Word Formation Process (also called Morphological Process) is a means by which new words are produced either by modification of existing words or by complete innovation, which in turn become a part of the language.
|
